Sanitary engineering — minimum recommended diameter for a domestic sewer laid at 1 in 100 gradient: Choose the most appropriate nominal diameter for a house sewer (building drain) at a longitudinal gradient of 1:100 under normal domestic conditions.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 100 mm

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Design of small sewers balances self-cleansing velocity, economy, and constructability. For building drains within premises, codes and practice specify minimum diameters ensuring adequate flow without frequent blockages at practical gradients.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Domestic wastewater with typical peaking factors.
  • Gradient provided is 1 in 100 (1%), common in plots with limited depth.
  • Pipe material compatible with standard fittings (PVC/stoneware).


Concept / Approach:

Empirical and code-based guidelines recommend a minimum of 100 mm for house sewers. With 1% slope, self-cleansing velocities are achievable for normal domestic discharge, making 100 mm the economical and acceptable choice. Larger diameters are used for branch/outside sewers and manhole-to-manhole lines (often 150 mm minimum).


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Check minimum code diameter for house sewers: typically 100 mm.2) Check gradient: 1 in 100 is within workable range for 100 mm lines.3) Select the smallest compliant diameter to ensure economy and maintain self-cleansing criteria.


Verification / Alternative check:

Numerous departmental SORs and plumbing handbooks cite 100 mm as minimum for WCs/soil lines; outside lines or longer runs often upgrade to 150 mm especially between chambers.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 150–200 mm are conservative and costlier for internal house sewers at 1% slope.
  • 175 mm is non-standard in many catalogs and offers no clear advantage here.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Oversizing small domestic lines reduces velocity, increasing deposition risk.
  • Ignoring minimum cover and ventilation leading to odors and surcharge.


Final Answer:

100 mm.

More Questions from Estimating and Costing

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion