Analogy — Choose the pair that mirrors authenticity vs doubt: Authenticity : Apocryphal :: ?

Introduction / Context:
“Apocryphal” means of doubtful authenticity or spurious. The pair “Authenticity : Apocryphal” encodes a tension between a positive quality (being genuine) and an adjective that negates or contradicts it (being of dubious origin). We must find a pair that parallels this opposition: a virtue confronted by an adjective that contradicts it.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Authenticity ↔ apocryphal (doubtful, spurious).
• Seek virtue ↔ adjective that undermines that virtue.

Concept / Approach:
Among the options, identify a moral or character virtue, then test whether the second word is an adjective that contradicts or nullifies that virtue in common evaluation.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Conceptual mapping: authenticity (virtue of being genuine) is contradicted by apocryphal (spurious). Integrity (virtue of moral wholeness) is contradicted by hypocritical (feigned morality). This preserves the structure.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Wickedness : Nefarious — same moral valence, not an opposition.
• Artifice : Deceptive — similar meaning; no virtue-to-negation contrast.
• Assertiveness : Dogmatic — different traits with no direct negation relation.
• None of these — incorrect because a parallel exists.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing synonymy with the required virtue-versus-negating-adjective structure.

Final Answer:
Integrity : Hypocritical