Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Private labour disputes can severely burden the public. The state should safeguard passenger interests through mediation and regulation, but compelling reinstatement absent legal adjudication overreaches managerial autonomy.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Asses whether each course is necessary, lawful, and proportionate. Mediation, dispute resolution mechanisms, and consumer protection measures are appropriate; forced reinstatement is not unless a competent authority finds wrongful termination.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I (order reinstatement): Not logically justified without due legal findings.2) II (mediate/end impasse): Directly addresses public interest while respecting due process; hence logical.3) Therefore, only II follows.Verification / Alternative check:Typical steps include labour conciliation, minimum service agreements, passenger refunds/reaccommodation, and safety oversight.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
• I or Both: Overreach.• Either: Treats an overreach as interchangeable with a valid remedy.• Neither: Neglects urgent passenger relief.Common Pitfalls:Assuming state power extends to private HR decisions without adjudication.
Final Answer:Only II follows.
Discussion & Comments