Statement:\nAlmost 90% of the flights of a private airline company were cancelled for the fourth consecutive day as pilots refused duty in protest against the sacking of two colleagues.\n\nCourses of Action:\nI. The Government should order the airline to reinstate the sacked pilots immediately to end the crisis.\nII. The Government should immediately take steps to end the impasse between the management and the pilots to help stranded passengers.\n\nWhich course(s) of action logically follow(s)?

Introduction / Context:
Private labour disputes can severely burden the public. The state should safeguard passenger interests through mediation and regulation, but compelling reinstatement absent legal adjudication overreaches managerial autonomy.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Impact: Widespread cancellations, stranded passengers.
• Stakeholders: Airline management, pilots, regulators, consumers.
• Public interest: Service restoration with safety and fairness.

Concept / Approach:
Asses whether each course is necessary, lawful, and proportionate. Mediation, dispute resolution mechanisms, and consumer protection measures are appropriate; forced reinstatement is not unless a competent authority finds wrongful termination.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Typical steps include labour conciliation, minimum service agreements, passenger refunds/reaccommodation, and safety oversight.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming state power extends to private HR decisions without adjudication.

Final Answer:
Only II follows.