Statement:\nTwo local passenger trains collided while running in opposite directions on the same track because the signalling system failed for a short period.\n\nCourses of Action:\nI. The services of the motormen of the trains should be terminated immediately.\nII. The government should immediately constitute a task force to review the functioning of the signalling system.\n\nWhich course(s) of action logically follow(s)?

Introduction / Context:
The collision is explicitly attributed to a signalling failure. Logical action should address the technical root cause and ensure it does not recur, while avoiding premature blame without investigation.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Proximate cause: Signalling failure.
• Safety objective: Prevent future conflicts on the same block/track.
• Due process: Individual liability must follow inquiry.

Concept / Approach:
Systems safety prioritizes root-cause analysis and corrective actions. Summary termination of motormen is unjustified unless evidence shows procedural violation beyond the system failure.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Independent safety boards typically recommend technical audits, SOP updates, and redundancy measures after such incidents.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Blaming frontline staff for systemic failures without evidence.

Final Answer:
Only II follows.