Up-counter driving a 4-bit DAC: “When the inputs of a 4-bit D/A converter are driven by a binary up-counter, the analog output looks like an upward sloping line.” Evaluate this description.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
A binary up-counter feeding a DAC is the basis of a staircase generator. Many texts informally say it “ramps up,” but the precise shape at the DAC output is key for understanding quantization effects and reconstruction filtering.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • 4-bit DAC, ideal behavior.
  • Binary up-counter increments by 1 code per tick.
  • No post-DAC low-pass smoothing unless stated.


Concept / Approach:
The DAC maps each successive code to a discrete analog level separated by one LSB. As the counter increments, the output steps upward by fixed increments, forming a staircase, not a continuous sloped line. A continuous ramp can be approximated only after low-pass filtering (reconstruction), which smooths the steps by integrating high-frequency components from the sampling process.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Counter counts: 0000, 0001, 0010, …, 1111.DAC outputs corresponding levels Vout = k * LSB for k = 0..15.Plotting Vout versus time shows flat segments with sudden rises → staircase.Continuous ramp arises only after intentional filtering; not inherent to the raw DAC output.


Verification / Alternative check:
Oscilloscope traces of DAC outputs driven by counters show step-and-hold behavior. Applying an RC or active low-pass can make the envelope look like a ramp, but the raw output remains quantized steps.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Correct: Ignores quantized nature of DAC output.
  • Only true after heavy filtering: That caveat is accurate, but the stem did not include it; as written, the claim is false.
  • Ambiguous: Update rate does not change the stepped nature without filtering.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating “monotonic increasing” with “line”; forgetting LSB granularity; assuming infinite update rate eliminates steps (it does not).


Final Answer:
Incorrect

More Questions from Interfacing to the Analog World

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion