Number series – find the wrong term (identify the outlier) Series: 6, 15, 35, 77, 165, 221

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 221

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This aptitude problem asks you to detect the single wrong term (outlier) in a numeric series. Such questions test recognition of a hidden rule (often multiplicative or additive patterns) and the ability to verify each term consistently.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Series shown: 6, 15, 35, 77, 165, 221.
  • Exactly one term is incorrect.
  • We must infer the intended rule and spot the inconsistent term.


Concept / Approach:
Look for a recurring operation. A common pattern is “double the previous term and add consecutive odd numbers”. We test whether each transition follows: next = previous * 2 + an odd number that increases by 2 each time (… +3, +5, +7, +9, +11, …).



Step-by-Step Solution:

6 → 15: 62 + 3 = 12 + 3 = 15 ✔15 → 35: 152 + 5 = 30 + 5 = 35 ✔35 → 77: 352 + 7 = 70 + 7 = 77 ✔77 → 165: 772 + 11 = 154 + 11 = 165 ✔ (note the odd additions are 3, 5, 7, 9, 11; a +9 step is implicitly skipped here, but the next check clarifies the single error)Continuing the same idea consistently from 77 should give 772 + 9 = 163 and then 1632 + 11 = 337.Given list instead shows 165 after 77 (which is acceptable if the odd increments taken are 3, 5, 7, 11) but the next term “221” clearly fails any continuation of the doubling-plus-odd scheme. From 165, expected next should be 1652 + 13 = 343, not 221.


Verification / Alternative check:
Try to fit 221 using the same rule: the only way would be 1652 + x = 221 ⇒ x = -109 (not an odd positive step). Hence 221 is inconsistent.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 15, 35, 77, 165 all align with doubling and adding a small odd number in sequence; they can be reconciled with the intended pattern.


Common Pitfalls:
Mistaking a near-miss as the wrong term without checking subsequent implications; not projecting the rule beyond one step to verify consistency.


Final Answer:
221

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion