Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 96
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a powers-of-two recognition task. The series should follow a simple doubling pattern; one term does not.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Check if each term is double the previous one. Powers of two proceed as 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, …
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
In a pure doubling progression, any deviation breaks the exact ratio of 2. Only 96 violates this principle.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Misreading 96 as 128; overlooking that every consecutive ratio must be exactly 2 for a powers-of-two run.
Final Answer:
96
Discussion & Comments