Question 1

In classful IPv4, how many distinct network IDs exist in Classes A, B, and C combined (excluding loopback and zero network conventions)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Older, classful IPv4 splits addresses into Classes A, B, and C based on the first octet. A common exam calculation asks for the total number of distinct network IDs available across these three classes, applying standard historical conventions (excluding loopback and the zero network). Given Data / Assumptions: Class A first-octet range: 1–126 (127 is loopback; 0 historically reserved). Class B first-octet range: 128–191. Class C first-octet range: 192–223. We count network IDs, not host counts. Concept / Approach: Compute the number of network IDs in each class and sum them. For classful addressing, the count is strictly positional based on fixed leading bits in the first octet (A: 0xxxxxxx excluding 0 and 127; B: 10xxxxxx; C: 110xxxxx). Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Class A networks: 1–126 => 126 network IDs.2) Class B networks: 128–191 => 64 first-octet values; each defines a block of 256 second-octet values => 64 * 256 = 16,384 network IDs.3) Class C networks: 192–223 => 32 first-octet values; each defines 256 * 256 network IDs => 32 * 65,536 = 2,097,152.4) Sum total = 126 + 16,384 + 2,097,152 = 2,113,662. Verification / Alternative check: Binary prefixes (A: 0, B: 10, C: 110) yield the same totals when expanded over the subsequent octets dedicated to network ID within each class. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2,113,658: off by 4; likely a miscount or an incorrect exclusion. 16,384: only the Class B total. 126: only the Class A total. 2,097,152: only the Class C total. Common Pitfalls: Confusing host capacity with the number of networks; excluding additional ranges beyond loopback and zero; or including Class D/E, which are not unicast network-ID pools. Final Answer: 2,113,662 classful network IDs in A + B + C.

Question 2

A defining requirement of an online real-time computing system is the ability to process inputs and produce outputs without unacceptable delay. Which option captures this requirement best?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Real-time systems are designed to react to events under strict timing constraints. “Online, real-time” emphasizes that data arrives continuously and must be acted on promptly, as in control loops, avionics, medical devices, or trading systems. Given Data / Assumptions: “Real-time” implies meeting deadlines, not merely high speed. “Online” implies immediate availability of inputs and outputs during operation. We seek the essential requirement, not an implementation detail. Concept / Approach: The core requirement is deterministic, bounded latency from input to response. Whether a system uses one CPU or many is an implementation choice, not a definition. Offline batch processing contradicts “online real-time.” Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify definition: real-time => deadlines must be met.2) Map to options: only one option states the timing requirement directly.3) Reject options that imply architecture mandates or offline behavior. Verification / Alternative check: In schedulability theory (e.g., rate-monotonic, earliest-deadline-first), the focus is on meeting timing constraints, not CPU count. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Multiple CPUs mandatory: real-time systems can be single-CPU; determinism matters. Offline batch processing: contradicts online, real-time behavior. All of the above: not possible because one choice contradicts the definition. None of the above: one choice is correct. Common Pitfalls: Equating high throughput with real-time; assuming parallelism guarantees deadlines; ignoring jitter and worst-case latency. Final Answer: Deterministic response with no unacceptable processing delay.

Question 3

Within the TCP/IP suite, which description correctly characterizes Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a foundational transport protocol of the Internet. Understanding its reliability, connection semantics, and OSI placement is essential for networking and systems exams. Given Data / Assumptions: OSI reference layers: Physical, Data Link, Network, Transport, Session, Presentation, Application. TCP is part of the transport layer in the TCP/IP model (mapped to OSI Transport). We compare connection orientation and reliability features. Concept / Approach: TCP establishes a virtual circuit via a 3-way handshake, ensures ordered delivery, provides retransmissions, flow control (windowing), and congestion control. It is therefore connection oriented and reliable. UDP, in contrast, is connectionless and unreliable. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify layer: TCP = Transport, not Data Link.2) Identify semantics: TCP uses connections (stateful endpoints).3) Identify reliability: acknowledgments, sequence numbers, retransmissions. Verification / Alternative check: Use the mnemonic: TCP = handshake + ACKs + sliding window + congestion control; UDP = minimal, best-effort datagrams. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Data Link layer: incorrect layer; TCP is Transport. Connection oriented and unreliable: contradicts TCP’s reliability features. Connectionless and unreliable: describes UDP-like behavior. Connectionless and reliable: uncommon pairing; not TCP. Common Pitfalls: Confusing OSI vs TCP/IP models; assuming “connection” equals “physical circuit” rather than a logical state machine. Final Answer: TCP is connection oriented and reliable.

Question 4

Historically, when and where was the first commercial computer modem introduced for data transmission over telephone lines?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Modems (modulator–demodulators) enabled early digital computers to communicate over analog telephone networks by converting digital data into tones and back. The question targets historical context: the first widely recognized commercial computer modem introduced for such use. Given Data / Assumptions: We focus on the first commercial, computer-oriented modem for data transmission over the public switched telephone network. We distinguish this from later standards and higher-speed devices. Dates refer to public availability/announcement rather than lab prototypes. Concept / Approach: Bell Labs/AT&T introduced the Bell 101 dataset modem in the late 1950s for 110 bit/s communications, followed by the Bell 103 (circa 1962) standard. The earlier device marks the first commercial instance for general computer data over phone lines. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the earliest commercial model: Bell 101 dataset modem.2) Place it in historical timeline: late 1950s (1958) in the USA.3) Compare with alternatives: Bell 103 (1962/1963) is later; European commercial availability followed. Verification / Alternative check: Industry histories consistently cite the Bell 101 (1958, USA) as the first commercial computer modem; Bell 103 standardized full-duplex 300 bit/s a few years later. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1963, USA: close but refers to later standards (e.g., Bell 103 era). 1965, Germany: later and different regional ecosystem. 1950, Japan: too early for a commercial computer modem on PSTN. None of the above: incorrect because 1958, USA is valid. Common Pitfalls: Confusing laboratory demonstrations with commercial availability; mixing up the first modem with the first standard widely adopted by hobbyists and businesses in the 1960s. Final Answer: 1958, USA.

Question 5

What best describes an encyclopedic database in the context of online information services and reference search?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Encyclopedic databases aggregate reference knowledge across broad domains, providing structured articles, cross-references, and search tools. This question asks which statement accurately characterizes such systems. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider commercial and institutional databases (e.g., academic encyclopedias), not only open wikis. Business models vary (subscriptions, freemium, institutional access). Usability depends on design, user background, and training. Concept / Approach: The defining trait is curated, searchable reference content with editorial processes, metadata, and indexing that support efficient retrieval and citation. Pricing and ease-of-use are not universal constants across all products. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the essential function: store, organize, and enable search of reference content.2) Evaluate claims about cost and ease: these vary widely across providers and audiences.3) Select the statement that remains true across products: curated information utility with strong indexing/search. Verification / Alternative check: Encyclopedic databases commonly feature controlled vocabularies, subject headings, cross-links, and advanced search filters—hallmarks of curated reference repositories. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Generally free: many are paid or restricted to institutions. Always easy for beginners: complexity and learning curves vary. All of the above: cannot be true because prior statements are not universally valid. None of the above: incorrect because one option is accurate. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “encyclopedic” implies free access; conflating user experience simplicity with content depth and indexing sophistication. Final Answer: A curated information utility specializing in storing, indexing, and searching reference knowledge.

Question 6

Packet-switched service (PSS) suitability: which characteristics typically fit PSS-style applications and traffic profiles?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Packet-switched services (PSS) are designed for statistical multiplexing of variable and bursty data streams across shared networks. The question asks which traffic and deployment characteristics align well with PSS. Given Data / Assumptions: “Bursty” means periods of activity interleaved with silence (idle time). Edges can be geographically distributed, including international connectivity. A single access circuit may serve many remote hosts/apps via packet multiplexing. Concept / Approach: PSS is efficient when many endpoints share capacity statistically rather than reserving dedicated circuits. This suits low-to-moderate average utilization with spiky peaks, and broad geographic dispersion. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Match traffic type: bursty, intermittent flows benefit from packet switching.2) Match topology: widely dispersed terminals are typical in enterprise WANs and public networks.3) Match access strategy: one local loop can multiplex many logical sessions to multiple remote services. Verification / Alternative check: Historical X.25 PSS and modern IP/MPLS networks both demonstrate gains from aggregation and statistical multiplexing for such traffic patterns. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Only one of the characteristics would be too narrow; PSS commonly embraces all listed traits. None of the above contradicts well-established PSS advantages. Common Pitfalls: Assuming circuit switching is better for all cases; ignoring that packet networks shine when average utilization is low relative to peak. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 7

Which of the following is a genuine advantage of using fiber-optic data transmission compared with metallic media?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Fiber-optic cables guide light rather than electrical signals. This physical difference confers multiple benefits over copper for many networking scenarios, especially backbone and high-speed links. Given Data / Assumptions: Comparison targets typical twisted pair or coaxial copper vs optical fiber. We consider practical deployments with standard transceivers. Security references passive pickup difficulty, not absolute immunity. Concept / Approach: Optical transmission avoids electromagnetic radiation that copper conductors emit and receive. Fiber’s bandwidth-distance product is far superior; it supports high rates with low attenuation and immunity to EMI/RFI. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Assess security: fiber does not radiate EM fields like copper; passive tapping is harder and usually requires physical intrusion.2) Assess speed/distance: single-mode and advanced WDM systems achieve extremely high aggregate rates across long spans.3) Assess noise/errors: optical links are immune to electromagnetic interference, reducing noise and typical error mechanisms. Verification / Alternative check: Industry adoption of fiber in data centers, metro, and long-haul backbones confirms these advantages, complemented by error performance statistics. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each individual advantage is valid; therefore, selecting only one understates fiber’s benefits. None of the above is false, since all are genuine advantages. Common Pitfalls: Believing fiber is impossible to tap (it is simply more difficult); overlooking cost/handling factors when comparing media. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 8

In North American T1 carrier systems, which line coding method is used for the transmitted signal on copper pairs?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: T1 (DS1) systems historically carry 24 voice channels over copper using a standardized framing and line coding. The question focuses on the specific line code used for T1 on the physical circuit. Given Data / Assumptions: We refer to classic T1 over copper (1.544 Mb/s). Early T1 employed Alternate Mark Inversion (AMI); later enhancements introduced B8ZS for long runs of zeros. We distinguish line coding from higher-layer multiplexing or framing. Concept / Approach: AMI is a bipolar code in which logical “1” pulses alternate in polarity (+, −, +, − …) and logical “0” is represented by no pulse. B8ZS (Bipolar with 8-Zero Substitution) deliberately injects bipolar violations to maintain timing when long zero sequences occur. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the family: T1 uses bipolar line coding on copper.2) Recall legacy vs improved: AMI initially, then B8ZS for better synchronization.3) Match the correct option: the one naming bipolar/AMI (with B8ZS) is correct. Verification / Alternative check: Telephony references consistently list AMI and B8ZS for T1, while E1 often uses HDB3—another bipolar code—illustrating regional standards. Why Other Options Are Wrong: NRZ: used in some links but not the T1 copper line code. Manchester: common in older Ethernet (10BASE-T coax variants), not T1. Binary (unipolar): not applicable to T1, which uses bipolar signaling. None of the above: incorrect because bipolar/AMI is correct. Common Pitfalls: Confusing framing with line coding; assuming Manchester applies broadly beyond Ethernet; overlooking B8ZS as an enhancement rather than a different family. Final Answer: Bipolar (AMI, later with B8ZS).

Question 9

In local area networking (LAN), computers can be interconnected wirelessly using radio (Wi-Fi) or infrared links. What is this class of LAN called?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Wireless local area networks eliminate copper or fiber runs between nodes by using radio frequency or, less commonly, infrared light to carry the frames that would otherwise travel over Ethernet cables. This question checks recognition of the proper umbrella term for such cable-free LAN interconnections. Given Data / Assumptions: Scope is a local area network (LAN). Mediums mentioned are radio (Wi-Fi) and infrared. We are identifying the class/name of such LANs. Concept / Approach: A LAN that uses radio or infrared as the physical medium for data transmission is categorized as a “wireless LAN” (WLAN). Standards include IEEE 802.11 families for radio; historical IR LANs also existed though are rare today. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that radio/infrared replace copper/fiber.Map that to the common LAN category using air as the medium.The accepted term is Wireless LANs (WLANs). Verification / Alternative check: IEEE 802.11 is explicitly titled “Wireless LAN.” Infrared LANs were standardized in earlier IEEE work and various proprietary systems, all under the WLAN umbrella. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Network topologies: Describes structural layouts (bus, star, mesh), not the medium. Multiplexer: A device/function for combining signals, not a LAN type. Modem: Modulator–demodulator, not a LAN classification. Infrared bus: Not a standard LAN category term. Common Pitfalls: Confusing media (wireless) with topology (star/mesh). A WLAN can still use a star topology via an access point. Final Answer: Wireless LANs

Question 10

In Microsoft networking, which configuration file is specifically used for NetBIOS name resolution on TCP/IP networks?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: NetBIOS name resolution predates widespread DNS use in Windows environments and is still relevant in legacy or isolated networks. Two similar-sounding files can cause confusion: HOSTS and LMHOSTS. This item distinguishes their roles. Given Data / Assumptions: Environment uses NetBIOS names over TCP/IP. Goal is static name-to-address mapping for NetBIOS. We compare common files/utilities. Concept / Approach: LMHOSTS provides static mappings of NetBIOS names to IP addresses. HOSTS maps DNS hostnames to IP addresses. ARP is a runtime cache/protocol, not a config file. FQDN is a naming format, not a file. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify that the naming system is NetBIOS, not DNS.Recall the specific static mapping file: LMHOSTS.Confirm other options do not satisfy NetBIOS static mapping. Verification / Alternative check: Windows documentation shows lmhosts.sam as the sample, with entries like “IPaddr NETBIOSNAME”. HOSTS is used for DNS queries only. Why Other Options Are Wrong: HOSTS: For DNS hostnames, not NetBIOS. ARP: Protocol/table for IP-to-MAC, not a name file. FQDN: A fully qualified domain name, not a file. None of the above: Incorrect because LMHOSTS exists for this purpose. Common Pitfalls: Assuming HOSTS also covers NetBIOS; it does not. NetBIOS name resolution uses LMHOSTS, WINS, or broadcast. Final Answer: LMHOSTS

Question 11

In IP addressing, what two components of an address does a subnet mask explicitly separate?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Subnet masks are fundamental to IPv4 addressing. They determine which portion of an IP address identifies the network and which portion identifies the host within that network. Given Data / Assumptions: We are working with IPv4 addressing. A subnet mask is applied via bitwise AND with an IP address. Outcome: network portion vs host portion. Concept / Approach: The mask has contiguous 1s for the network bits followed by 0s for host bits. ANDing the IP with the mask yields the network ID. The remaining low-order bits designate host IDs within that network. Step-by-Step Solution: Write IP in binary and align it with the mask.Mask 1s select the network bits; 0s select the host bits.Thus, the mask delineates network ID from host ID. Verification / Alternative check: Compute any sample: 192.168.1.75 AND 255.255.255.0 = 192.168.1.0 (network ID); host ID is .75 in that subnet. Why Other Options Are Wrong: DHCP scopes: An admin construct, not defined by masks. Domains: DNS concept, unrelated to IP masks. Subnets: Masks create subnets, but the separation is network vs host. Routing metrics: Determined by protocols, not masks. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “subnet” with “network ID”; the mask carves the boundary, not the routing policy. Final Answer: Network ID and host ID

Question 12

If the ASCII character 'G' is transmitted but the receiver interprets it as 'D', what type of transmission error best describes this situation (analyze the bit pattern change)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error classifications help diagnose channel issues and select suitable detection/correction schemes. When a transmitted character turns into another, the difference in their binary codes reveals whether the corruption affected one bit, several bits scattered, or a contiguous run (burst). Given Data / Assumptions: Transmitted: ‘’G’’ (ASCII 0x47 = 0100 0111 in 7-bit plus parity or 8-bit form). Received: ‘’D’’ (ASCII 0x44 = 0100 0100). Assume standard ASCII and negligible framing/parity overhead for this classification. Concept / Approach: Compare the binary patterns. G = 0100 0111 and D = 0100 0100 differ in the two least-significant bits: 11 -> 00. Two adjacent bit positions changed, which is characteristic of a short burst error (contiguous bits corrupted). Step-by-Step Solution: Write binary: G = 0100 0111.Write binary: D = 0100 0100.Identify differences: bit0 and bit1 (LSBs) flipped from 1 to 0.Adjacent flips imply a burst of length 2 rather than an isolated single-bit error. Verification / Alternative check: Hamming distance between G and D is 2. Because the flipped bits are contiguous, it aligns with “burst” classification (a run of bits altered). If the two flipped bits were far apart, it would be multiple-bit non-burst. Why Other Options Are Wrong: single-bit: Only one bit differs; here two do. multiple-bit: True that multiple bits changed, but “burst” is a more precise classification given adjacency. recoverable: Not a standard error type; recoverability depends on coding. framing: Concerns start/stop/flag alignment, not symbol bit flips. Common Pitfalls: Equating any 2-bit error with generic “multiple-bit.” When adjacency exists, “burst” conveys cause (e.g., short noise spike). Final Answer: burst

Question 13

Which option best defines a communication network in the context of data communications among attached stations?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: A communication network is more than a wire or a radio channel; it is an organized system that interconnects devices and provides end-to-end data transfer services according to protocols and architectures. Given Data / Assumptions: We focus on the system as a whole, not a single medium or fault state. Stations are attached nodes (hosts, routers, switches). Service includes addressing, routing/switching, and reliable delivery functions. Concept / Approach: A network comprises functional units (links, switches, routers, protocols, management) that cooperate to deliver communication between stations. This holistic definition distinguishes “network” from “bus,” “carrier,” or “collision.” Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the definition that references interconnected units plus provided service.Exclude options that describe only media (conductors, carriers) or error states (collisions).Select the comprehensive system-level description. Verification / Alternative check: Standard textbooks define networks as interconnected nodes/links implementing protocols that provide communication services. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Conductors: Describes a physical bus/backplane, not a network. Continuous frequency carrier: Describes a channel characteristic. Collision condition: A transient MAC-layer event, not a network. None of the above: Incorrect because one option is correct. Common Pitfalls: Confusing a medium (wire/radio) with the layered services that make up a network. Final Answer: a collection of interconnected functional units that provides a data communications service among stations attached to the network

Question 14

In multiple-access networks, what term describes the event that occurs when two stations transmit over the medium at the same time?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Medium access control (MAC) protocols govern how multiple stations share a common medium. Understanding the terms for access methods and failure conditions is essential for analyzing throughput and reliability. Given Data / Assumptions: Two stations transmit at the same time on a shared medium. The network uses a contention-based MAC (e.g., CSMA/CD/CA) or similar. We are naming the event that results. Concept / Approach: A simultaneous transmission produces a signal overlap called a collision. Contention is the process of competing for the medium; collision is the unwanted outcome when competition fails to avoid overlap. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify timing overlap of two transmissions.Recognize the MAC-layer term for this event: collision.Distinguish from contention (access method) and timing disciplines (synchronous/asynchronous). Verification / Alternative check: Ethernet CSMA/CD explicitly detects and resolves collisions; Wi-Fi CSMA/CA aims to avoid them but they can still occur. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Contention: Describes the access strategy, not the overlap event. Synchronous/Asynchronous: Timing schemes, not the event of overlap. Deterministic access: Token/time-slot methods designed to prevent collisions. Common Pitfalls: Using “contention” and “collision” interchangeably; they are related but distinct. Final Answer: Collision

Question 15

Frame Relay (packet switching) and ATM (cell switching) are examples of which category in wide-area networking choices?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: WAN services have historically been offered in multiple switching/transport options. Organizations chose among these alternatives based on committed information rates, latency, QoS, and cost structures. Given Data / Assumptions: Examples provided: Frame Relay (variable-length packets) and ATM (fixed 53-byte cells). We are to choose the best overarching category that fits these examples. The context is WAN service selection. Concept / Approach: Both Frame Relay and ATM were standardized WAN offerings that enterprises could select as alternatives to private lines or other services—effectively choices for how to buy and allocate bandwidth and switching behavior across a carrier network. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify commonality: both are carrier WAN switching services.Classify them as service/bandwidth procurement alternatives available to customers.Select the option that best labels such choices: “Bandwidth alternatives.” Verification / Alternative check: Historical vendor/carrier catalogs group Frame Relay, ATM, and leased lines as alternative WAN bandwidth services, each with distinct SLAs and cost models. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Switching alternating: Not a standard term; likely a distractor. Inter organizational networks / Extranets: Describe who connects, not how bandwidth is provisioned. Wireless topologies: Unrelated to FR/ATM carrier services. Common Pitfalls: Confusing technology examples with organizational scope (intranet/extranet). Final Answer: Bandwidth alternatives

Question 16

Which device links two homogeneous packet-broadcast local networks (e.g., two Ethernet segments) and forwards frames based on MAC addresses?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: LAN interconnection can be done at different layers. Devices that operate on MAC addresses and forward frames between similar LANs are distinct from repeaters (physical) and routers (network layer). Given Data / Assumptions: Networks are homogeneous packet-broadcast LANs (e.g., Ethernet to Ethernet). Forwarding decision is based on MAC addresses. Goal is segmenting collision domains and learning addresses. Concept / Approach: A bridge (including modern multi-port switches) builds a MAC address table by learning source addresses and forwards frames to the correct segment, reducing unnecessary traffic and isolating collisions while preserving a single broadcast domain (unless VLANs are used). Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize same-type LANs being interconnected (homogeneous).Match to a device that understands layer-2 addresses.Select “bridge” as the correct device class (today commonly implemented as a switch). Verification / Alternative check: IEEE 802.1D bridges perform transparent bridging using MAC learning and spanning tree to prevent loops. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Hub: Physical-layer repeater that floods signals; no MAC learning. Repeater: Only regenerates signals; no frame filtering. Gateway: Heterogeneous inter-protocol translation at higher layers. Router: Connects different IP subnets at layer 3, not layer 2 bridging (though both interconnect networks). Common Pitfalls: Equating modern Ethernet “switches” with routers; a typical switch is a multi-port bridge. Final Answer: bridge

Question 17

The transfer of data from the CPU to peripheral devices (printers, disks, serial/USB devices) is achieved through which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: CPUs communicate with peripherals via well-defined hardware and software boundaries. The generic term that encompasses buses, controllers, and ports exposed to devices is “interfaces.” Given Data / Assumptions: We are describing the mechanism enabling CPU–device data transfer. Peripherals may be storage, printers, or I/O devices. Both hardware connectors and controller logic are considered. Concept / Approach: An interface is the standardized point of interaction—electrical, logical, and protocol—between the CPU/memory subsystem and a device (e.g., PCIe, SATA, USB). Ports are specific physical connection points but are one aspect of an interface; buffers assist performance but are not the transfer mechanism themselves. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the broad mechanism: standardized interconnect specifications.Map examples (USB, PCIe, SATA) to the generic term “interfaces.”Conclude that “interfaces” best captures CPU–peripheral data transfer. Verification / Alternative check: System block diagrams label device links as interfaces, while ports are the external connectors provided by these interfaces (e.g., USB port using the USB interface). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Modems: Used for telecom links, not CPU–device buses. Computer ports: Physical endpoints; too narrow relative to the full mechanism. Buffer memory: Temporary storage, not the interconnect itself. None of the above: Incorrect because “interfaces” is correct. Common Pitfalls: Using “port” and “interface” synonymously; an interface defines the protocol, a port is often just the connector. Final Answer: interfaces

Question 18

You have network 192.168.10.0 and need at least 25 usable host addresses per subnet while maximizing the number of subnets. Which subnet mask should you choose?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Subnet design balances host capacity and number of subnets. Given a Class C-like private block 192.168.10.0, we must pick a mask that provides at least 25 usable hosts in each subnet and yields the greatest number of such subnets. Given Data / Assumptions: Network: 192.168.10.0/24 as the starting block. Required usable hosts per subnet: ≥ 25. Goal: maximize number of subnets. Concept / Approach: For a /27 mask (255.255.255.224), each subnet has 32 addresses total and 30 usable (subtract network and broadcast). For a /28 (255.255.255.240), there are 16 total, 14 usable—insufficient. A /26 (255.255.255.192) has 62 usable but halves the number of subnets compared to /27. Step-by-Step Solution: Check /28: 2^(32-28) = 16 total, 14 usable < 25 → invalid.Check /27: 2^(32-27) = 32 total, 30 usable ≥ 25 → valid.Between valid candidates, choose the one that yields more subnets (/27 over /26). Verification / Alternative check: Subnet counts in a /24: /27 yields 8 subnets (0,32,64,96,128,160,192,224), each with 30 usable; /26 yields 4 subnets with 62 usable—fewer subnets than /27. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 255.255.255.192 (/26): Meets hosts but fewer subnets than /27. 255.255.255.240 (/28): Only 14 usable, below 25. 255.255.255.248 (/29): Only 6 usable, far below requirement. 255.255.255.255 (/32): Single host route, not a subnet mask for multiple hosts. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting to subtract 2 addresses per subnet for network and broadcast; mixing up total vs usable host counts. Final Answer: 255.255.255.224

Question 19

In data communications, which statement correctly describes protocol converters and how they are typically deployed in practical networks?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Protocol converters are devices or software systems that translate between two dissimilar protocols so that otherwise incompatible endpoints can interoperate. They often appear at network edges, industrial automation boundaries, or between legacy and modern systems, ensuring signaling, framing, timing, and semantics are correctly mapped. Given Data / Assumptions: Two endpoints use different link, network, or application protocols. Both directions of traffic must be understood by the far side. Goals include functional compatibility, not bandwidth aggregation. Concept / Approach: Unlike multiplexers (including TDMs) that combine multiple similar streams onto one link, protocol converters translate format and procedure from protocol A to protocol B and back. In many deployments, translation is needed in both directions so that requests and responses remain intelligible, which is why they are commonly operated in pairs or as bidirectional units with symmetric logic. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify that the problem is incompatibility, not channel scarcity.2) Choose conversion (A↔B) rather than multiplexing (many A→one A).3) Provide bidirectional conversion so that both sides can initiate and respond.4) Deploy as a pair or a single bidirectional converter to ensure full-duplex interoperability. Verification / Alternative check: Industrial gateways (e.g., Modbus↔PROFINET), telephony/media gateways (SIP↔H.323), or serial↔IP protocol bridges all rely on two-way translation logic, confirming the need for paired or bidirectional operation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Same as multiplexers/TDMs: multiplexing aggregates streams; it does not translate procedures or semantics. Not operated in pairs: one-way conversion would break request/response flows. None of the above: incorrect because one option is correct. Common Pitfalls: Confusing bandwidth aggregation (multiplexing) with protocol translation, or assuming one-way conversion is sufficient for interactive systems. Final Answer: Protocol converters are usually operated in pairs to translate in both directions

Question 20

In X.121 addressing for public data networks, how many leading digits of the Network User Address constitute the DNIC (Data Network Identification Code)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: The X.121 addressing scheme was used by X.25 public data networks to identify networks and subscribers. A critical element of the address is the DNIC, which directs packets to the correct national or international data network before final delivery to the subscriber endpoint. Given Data / Assumptions: An X.121 Network User Address (NUA) begins with a network-identifying prefix. DNIC is a fixed-length portion at the start of the NUA. We seek the exact length of that prefix in digits. Concept / Approach: The DNIC uniquely identifies a public data network and is positioned at the head of the NUA. It is composed of four digits: a three-digit country/network zone code plus a single digit identifying the specific public data network within that country/zone. After the DNIC, the remaining digits identify the subscriber within that network. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recognize the NUA structure: DNIC + subscriber number.2) Recall that DNIC length is standardized to 4 digits.3) Conclude that the first four digits of the NUA form the DNIC. Verification / Alternative check: Historic X.25 documentation and implementations consistently parse the first four digits to route traffic into the proper PDN before subscriber-level lookup. Why Other Options Are Wrong: First three/five/seven: do not match the standardized 4-digit DNIC. None of the above: invalid because the correct standard length is defined. Common Pitfalls: Confusing country codes in telephony (E.164) with DNIC; although both are prefixes, their lengths and purposes differ. Final Answer: first four

Networking Questions