Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only conclusion II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Many banking and reasoning exams test your ability to judge what conclusions follow directly from a given statement. Here the statement is an advertisement promising: 'Double your money in five months.' We must evaluate two candidate conclusions and decide which is logically supported without adding external assumptions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
Check Conclusion I: 'The assurance is not genuine.' The statement does not supply any proof of falsity. Claiming non-genuineness requires extra information. So I does not follow.Check Conclusion II: 'People want their money to grow.' The very purpose of such an advertisement is to attract those who desire growth of their funds. The ad presupposes this general motive; otherwise the message would be pointless. Hence II reasonably follows.Verification / Alternative check:
If people did not seek returns, such a pitch would be ineffective. Therefore the existence of that desire is a fair, minimal inference. However, genuineness or fraudulence cannot be inferred either way from the text alone.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
'Only I' is incorrect because the statement never indicates falsity. 'Either I or II' is wrong because only II follows. 'Neither' is wrong since II follows. 'Both' is too strong; I does not follow.Common Pitfalls:
Letting real-world skepticism override the strict rule: conclude only what the text implies. Ads imply a consumer desire but do not, by themselves, prove or disprove authenticity.Final Answer:
Only conclusion II follows
Discussion & Comments