Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Given data
Concept / ApproachA strong argument appeals to long-term sustainability and national interest; resource finiteness is a compelling reason. Capital constraints are planning issues, not decisive reasons to abandon the idea.
Step-by-step evaluationStep 1: I is strategic and forward-looking; it strongly supports diversification into renewables.Step 2: II is defeatist and not absolute; capital can be mobilised via phased investments, public–private partnerships, or foreign technology tie-ups.
Verification / AlternativeEnergy policy globally emphasises renewables due to exhaustibility of fossil fuels—aligns with I.
Common pitfalls
Final AnswerOnly argument I is strong.
Discussion & Comments