Law and society — punish those who receive dowry despite prohibition? Statement: Should those who receive dowry, despite the law prohibiting it, be punished? Arguments: I. Yes — anyone who violates the law must be punished. II. No — the dowry system.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This problem tests legal reasoning and the relevance of cultural practices versus statutory prohibition. A strong argument must be consistent with the rule of law and the policy objective of the statute. Given Data / Assumptions: Dowry is prohibited by law. I argues for enforcing the law against violators. II appeals to tradition (“since time immemorial”) as a reason not to punish. Concept / Approach: Laws are enacted to change harmful practices. Tradition cannot legitimize an illegal act. Strong arguments rely on legality and public-interest goals (deterrence, protection). Step-by-Step Solution: I is strong: If a conduct is criminalized, punishment follows upon proof to deter and uphold justice.II is weak: Appeal to tradition is a fallacy and contradicts the purpose of the statute. Verification / Alternative check: Social reform laws (e.g., against dowry) are enforced despite historical prevalence; otherwise, the law is meaningless. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Only II / Both / Either / Neither: These ignore that only I aligns with law and policy. Common Pitfalls: Confusing social prevalence with legitimacy. Final Answer: Only argument I is strong

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments