Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This question tests practical reasoning versus stereotype. It asks whether girls should learn martial arts such as judo and karate. The evaluation hinges on safety benefits versus a claim about “feminine grace.”
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
Argument I is strong: Defensive readiness and situational confidence are meaningful benefits for personal safety.Argument II is weak: It relies on subjective notions of “grace,” not on evidence; many practitioners maintain or enhance poise and fitness.Verification / Alternative check:
Experience shows self-defence programs improve awareness, balance, and resilience without compromising appearance or demeanor.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II / Both / Either / Neither: These options overlook that only I directly supports a valuable, demonstrable objective.Common Pitfalls:
Giving weight to stereotypes instead of practical safety considerations.Final Answer:
Only argument I is strong
Discussion & Comments