Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Fulfiled
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Words that insert an extra “l” before “-ed/-ing” often follow rules tied to stress and syllable structure. The past form “fulfilled” derives from “fulfill” and doubles the “l” before “-ed”: fulfill → fulfilled. Writing “fulfiled” omits one “l” and breaks the standard pattern.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Doubling rules: with “fulfill”, American English uses “fulfill/fulfilled”; British English often “fulfil/fulfilled”. In both standards, the past form has double “l” before “-ed”. Therefore “fulfiled” (single “l” before “ed”) is nonstandard in either variety.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify the base: fulfill (AmE) / fulfil (BrE).2) Form past: fulfilled (double “l” kept).3) Compare option B: missing one “l” → error.4) Confirm other options follow consistent doubling rules: filled, expelled, skilled are correct.
Verification / Alternative check:
Check noun “fulfillment/fulfilment” – both retain double “l” around the suffix; this supports “fulfilled”.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Dropping one “l” due to quick typing; mixing BrE/AmE base forms but still the past remains “fulfilled”.
Final Answer:
Fulfiled
Discussion & Comments