Statement: At least five students were killed in a stampede in a city school as students rushed to leave the building, fearing an electrical short circuit. Courses of Action: I. The principal of the school should be arrested immediately. II. The government should order the school to be closed permanently with immediate effect. Which course(s) of action logically follow(s)?
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Introduction / Context:Tragic incidents demand prompt action, but logical courses must reflect investigation, accountability aligned to findings, and proportionate remediation—rather than reflexive punishment or irreversible closures without facts.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Event: Stampede triggered by fear of an electrical short circuit.
- Unknowns: Actual cause, compliance with safety norms, evacuation protocols, prior notices, infrastructure status.
- Principles: Due process, safety audits, corrective measures, targeted accountability.
Concept / Approach:We reject actions that presume guilt or impose extreme sanctions without inquiry. Appropriate immediate steps include medical aid, crowd control, forensic/electrical audit, review of safety drills, and temporary suspension if required pending inquiry.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Arrest principal immediately (I): Arrest requires prima facie evidence of culpable negligence or violation. Without an inquiry, immediate arrest is not logically warranted.2) Close the school permanently (II): Permanent closure is disproportionate absent conclusive findings. Corrective measures (wiring overhaul, drills, compliance checks) or temporary closure pending safety clearance are more rational.3) Hence, neither I nor II follows at this stage.Verification / Alternative check:Standard responses: set up an inquiry committee, electrical safety audit, enforce compliance, impose penalties if negligence is established, and implement evacuation training—demonstrating measured, fact-based action.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
• Only I / Only II: Each presupposes conclusions without evidence.• Either / Both: Extreme measures are not justified a priori.Common Pitfalls:Letting outrage substitute for process. Logical action requires facts first, sanctions next.
Final Answer:Neither I nor II follows.