Integrator settling — “5τ regardless of pulses” claim: “The steady-state condition of an RC integrator is reached after 5 time constants regardless of how many input pulses occur in that interval.” Evaluate this statement.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The “5τ rule” is a convenient guideline for first-order responses to a step input: after about five time constants, a system is essentially settled near its final value. However, applying this rule blindly to RC integrators driven by pulse trains can be misleading. The steady-state level depends on waveform shape, duty cycle, and repetition rate, not just elapsed time.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • RC integrator with output across the capacitor.
  • Input: not a single step but pulses that may repeat within the 5τ window.
  • No saturation; linear behavior assumed.


Concept / Approach:
For a single step, the capacitor voltage approaches its final value as v_C(t) = V_final − (V_final − V_initial) * exp(−t/τ). After ~5τ, the error is under 1%. For a pulse train, the output is the convolution of the input with the RC exponential; the final steady-state depends on the periodic input’s average and duty cycle. Multiple pulses within 5τ continually perturb the capacitor, preventing it from reaching the same level as a single uninterrupted step would. Therefore, “steady-state after 5τ regardless of pulses” is incorrect.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Recognize the 5τ guideline applies to step responses, not arbitrary repeated pulses.For pulse trains, compute or reason from average value and time constants; repeated charging/discharging leads to a periodic steady-state that depends on duty cycle and period.If pulses repeat faster than the RC can settle, the capacitor never reaches the single-step asymptote.Hence the blanket statement is false.


Verification / Alternative check:
Simulate with τ = 10 ms and a 2 ms wide pulse repeating every 4 ms. Even after many multiples of 5τ, the waveform remains a periodic ripple around a duty-cycle-dependent mean, not a step-like flat level. This contradicts the claim.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Correct: Misapplies the 5τ rule beyond its domain.
  • True only for single-step inputs / Undetermined without duty cycle: These clarifications highlight the real dependency; the original statement’s universality is incorrect.


Common Pitfalls:
Using “5τ” as a magic number for every situation; forgetting that different inputs produce different steady-state behaviors even in the same RC network.


Final Answer:
Incorrect.

More Questions from Time Response of Reactive Circuits

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion