Serial vs. parallel data lines Which statement best describes the wiring requirement for parallel transmission of digital data between a sender and a receiver?
-
Ais much slower than the serial transmission of data.
-
Brequires only one signal line between sender and receiver.
-
Crequires as many signal lines between sender and receiver as there are data bits.
-
Dis less expensive than the serial method of data transmission.
Answer
Correct Answer: requires as many signal lines between sender and receiver as there are data bits.
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Choosing between serial and parallel links affects cabling, connectors, cost, and speed. Understanding the line requirements prevents design mistakes in hardware interfacing.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Parallel interfaces send multiple bits simultaneously.
- Each bit typically needs its own dedicated conductor plus grounds and control lines.
Concept / Approach:Parallel transfer uses N data lines for N-bit words so all bits arrive concurrently. This increases connector size and crosstalk risk but reduces per-word latency over short distances.
Step-by-Step Solution:Define parallel: multiple bits in the same time slot.Consequence: provide one conductor per bit path.Therefore, the number of signal lines equals the number of bits transmitted in parallel.
Verification / Alternative check:Legacy printer ports (8-bit parallel) used eight data lines plus control/status lines, illustrating the rule.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Much slower”: parallel is not inherently slower; it can be faster over short cables.“Only one signal line”: describes serial, not parallel.“Less expensive”: usually false due to more conductors and larger connectors.
Common Pitfalls:Ignoring skew and crosstalk; at high speed and distance, serial links often outperform parallel.
Final Answer:requires as many signal lines between sender and receiver as there are data bits.