Reading comprehension—best supported inference: For fitness walkers, a commute to a health club is unnecessary; your neighborhood can serve as your health club; little equipment is needed beyond a well-designed pair of athletic shoes. Which statement is best supported by this paragraph?
Logical Reasoning
Analyzing Arguments
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
AFitness walking is a better form of exercise than weight lifting.
-
BA membership in a health club is a poor investment.
-
CWalking outdoors provides a better workout than walking indoors.
-
DFitness walking is a convenient and valuable form of exercise.
-
EPoorly designed athletic shoes can cause major foot injuries.
Answer
Correct Answer: Fitness walking is a convenient and valuable form of exercise.
Explanation
Given data
- No commute is needed for fitness walking; the neighborhood suffices.
- Fancy equipment is unnecessary; a good pair of athletic shoes is sufficient.
Concept / ApproachIdentify the option that captures convenience and value without inserting extra claims.
Step-by-step reasoningStep 1: No commute + minimal equipment ⇒ high convenience.Step 2: The framing of "all you need is shoes" suggests accessibility and value.Step 3: Option D summarizes these points. Options A–C, E add comparisons or injury claims not stated.
Verification / Alternative viewThe paragraph never ranks exercises or critiques club memberships; it highlights convenience and sufficiency.
Common pitfalls
- Reading evaluative judgments (e.g., "better than weight lifting") into a purely descriptive passage.
Final AnswerFitness walking is a convenient and valuable form of exercise.