Critical reading – sun exposure warnings vs. adult behavior The passage describes abundant products and public campaigns (e.g., National Skin Cancer Awareness Month) warning about UV danger, yet a survey finds fewer than half of adults adequately protect themselves. What statement is best supported?

Introduction / Context:
The author contrasts plentiful warnings/products with a survey outcome: fewer than half of adults protect themselves adequately. The task is to infer the most directly supported conclusion.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Many sun-protection products exist and campaigns warn of UV risk.
• Despite this, fewer than 50% of adults protect themselves adequately.
• No comparative data about children, sales levels, or cancer incidence trends are provided.

Concept / Approach:
Reason to the simplest explanation linked by the text: adult behavior is not matching guidance; hence warnings are not being heeded seriously enough.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Observe mismatch: high awareness efforts vs. low compliance.Translate to conclusion: adults are not following the guidance seriously.Eliminate choices introducing new claims (children vs. adults, record sales, cancer rates, lack of information).

Verification / Alternative check:
Even if information is abundant, poor adherence yields the survey result; thus the supported conclusion is about adult behavior, not information scarcity.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Children vs. adults: not discussed.
• All-time high sales: not given.
• More cancer now: not in text.
• “Not enough information”: contradicts the description of many campaigns.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing availability of information with compliance; the survey points to behavior, not awareness gaps.

Final Answer:
adults are not heeding the warnings about the dangers of sun exposure seriously enough.