Some states are considering laws that prohibit calculator use before sixth grade, while other states insist every middle schooler have a graphing calculator; taken together, this paragraph best supports which conclusion about policy views on calculator use in schools within this country?
-
ACalculators are frequently a detriment to learning mathematics.
-
BThe argument against calculators in school is unfounded.
-
CState legislators are more involved in education than ever before.
-
DThere are at least two distinct opinions about using calculators in schools.
-
EGraphing calculators become cheaper when schools buy in bulk.
Answer
Correct Answer: There are at least two distinct opinions about using calculators in schools.
Explanation
Given data
- One group of states seeks to prohibit calculators before grade six.
- Another group insists on graphing calculators for all middle school students.
Concept/Approach (extract the minimal warranted inference)Infer only what both lines of evidence jointly guarantee: policy positions diverge.
Step 1: Recognize opposing policiesProhibition vs. requirement shows clear disagreement.
Step 2: Avoid overreachNothing is said about learning harm, cost in bulk, or historical involvement of legislators.
Step 3: Select the precise supported statement"There are at least two opinions" exactly captures the supported conclusion.
Verification/AlternativeImagining a map: some states restrict, others mandate; hence multiple viewpoints exist.
Common pitfallsDo not infer outcomes (learning results, pricing) not mentioned in the passage.
Final AnswerThere are at least two distinct opinions about using calculators in schools.