Height ordering with partial information: Mukesh is taller than Suresh but shorter than Rakesh. Rakesh is taller than Harish but shorter than Amar. Who is the shortest?

Introduction / Context:
The problem provides two chains that overlap only at Rakesh. We must find the shortest person, but some cross-comparisons are missing, leading to multiple consistent orders.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Suresh < Mukesh < Rakesh.
• Harish < Rakesh < Amar.
• No direct comparison between Suresh and Harish.

Concept / Approach:
Build allowable orders consistent with both chains. If the identity of the shortest varies across valid orders, the answer cannot be uniquely determined.

Step-by-Step Exploration:

Verification / Alternative check:
Try sample numeric heights consistent with the inequalities. You can realize both “Suresh shortest” and “Harish shortest” assignments without violating the statements.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Mukesh: Always above Suresh and possibly above Harish.
• Suresh or Harish individually: Either could be shortest depending on missing cross-comparison.
• None of these: The intent is that uniqueness fails; the correct meta-answer is “Cannot be determined.”

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming unprovided comparisons (e.g., assuming Suresh < Harish) without justification.

Final Answer:
Cannot be determined