Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Cannot be determined
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The relations place T below both A and Q, and above P and B. However, there is no comparison between A and Q. With all heights distinct, the tallest must be either A or Q, but we cannot tell which.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Construct consistent orders. Since A and Q are both above T and un-compared with each other, each of the two can be the global maximum in some valid arrangement.
Step-by-Step Illustration:
1) Put B at the bottom (since P is not the shortest).2) Place P above B but below T (as given).3) Place T above P and B.4) A and Q are above T, but no order is specified between them.5) Scenario A: A > Q > T > P > B ⇒ tallest is A.6) Scenario B: Q > A > T > P > B ⇒ tallest is Q.Verification / Alternative check:Both scenarios satisfy all statements, proving non-uniqueness.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Forcing an order between A and Q without evidence.
Final Answer:Cannot be determined
Discussion & Comments