Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: K
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:We must locate the minimum height given several partial comparisons, including a strong statement that pins J and M near the top.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:From “M only shorter than J,” we know J > M and M ≥ everyone else. That means M ≥ L, N, K. Combined with L > N > K, it follows that among {L, N, K}, K is at the bottom. Since both J and M are above that trio, K is the global minimum.
Step-by-Step Ordering:
1) Fix top: J (1st), M (2nd).2) From L > N > K, place K at the bottom within this sub-chain.3) Because M is not shorter than any of L, N, K, none of them can lie above M; hence the shortest overall is K.Verification / Alternative check:Assign sample heights (e.g., J=10, M=9, L=8, N=7, K=6). All statements hold and K is shortest.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Misreading “only shorter than J” and accidentally placing someone above M.
Final Answer:K
Discussion & Comments