Engineering Design and Society — Needs Alignment Can a well-run engineering design process explicitly identify, translate, and meet societal needs such as safety, accessibility, affordability, and sustainability through requirements and tradeoffs?

Introduction / Context:
Engineering design converts stakeholder and societal needs into feasible solutions. This question probes whether the process can address societal needs directly.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Societal needs can be expressed as requirements and constraints.
• Tradeoffs are evaluated against measurable criteria.
• Design decisions affect real-world outcomes.

Concept / Approach:
Translating needs into requirements allows teams to design features and controls that satisfy those needs while balancing cost, performance, and risk.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify societal needs (safety, inclusivity, sustainability).2) Translate into requirements and targets.3) Evaluate concepts against these targets.4) Select designs that best meet needs within constraints.

Verification / Alternative check:
Standards and certifications codify societal expectations; meeting them is evidence of alignment.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Incorrect” ignores the role of requirements. The other options wrongly limit the scope to specific sectors.

Common Pitfalls:
Leaving societal needs as vague aspirations instead of measurable criteria.

Final Answer:
Correct