Evaluate the claim: “Using drawings to represent the design of objects to be built or constructed is a relatively new concept.” Decide whether this historical statement is correct.

Introduction / Context:
The practice of representing designs with drawings predates modern industry by centuries. The statement suggests that using drawings for design is relatively new. We evaluate its historical accuracy.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Historical records of architectural and engineering drawings.
• Examples include ancient architecture and Renaissance works.
• “Relatively new” implies recent decades, which is inconsistent with evidence.

Concept / Approach:
From ancient builders to Renaissance masters, drawings have served to communicate geometry and intent. Modern CAD is new, but drawing as a medium is ancient.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify timeframe: drawings used in antiquity and codified during the Renaissance.2) Differentiate medium (paper vs digital) from the practice (drawing).3) Conclude that the statement claiming novelty is incorrect.

Verification / Alternative check:
Historical portfolios and treatises show detailed plans, sections, and elevations long before computers.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct”: Ignores extensive historical precedent.“Only new since computer CAD”: Confuses tool with practice.“True for civil works only”: Drawings have been universal across domains.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating CAD with the origin of technical drawing; overlooking manual drafting traditions.

Final Answer:
Incorrect