Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if the candidate is not to be selected
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In policy-based screening, a single failure on a core threshold typically disqualifies the candidate unless an explicit relaxation or referral clause exists. This question tests strict adherence to minimum criteria.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Check each criterion in sequence and stop at the first failure. If any core criterion is below the stated minimum, the final outcome is “not to be selected.”
Step-by-Step Solution:
PG in Marketing: 65% ≥ 60% → Pass.Graduation: 50% < 55% → Fail (core education threshold).Selection: 50% ≥ 50% → Would pass, but prior failure controls.Experience: 6 years ≥ 3 years → Would pass, but prior failure controls.Since Graduation is below the minimum, decision → Not to be selected.
Verification / Alternative check:
Even if later criteria are strong (e.g., PG 65% and 6 years experience), a policy with independent minima requires all to be satisfied. No compensatory mechanism is defined.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“To be selected” ignores the graduation shortfall. “Data inadequate” is incorrect as all values are present. “Refer to VP marketing” is not a defined remediation in this policy.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming higher PG marks can compensate for low graduation percentage; unless explicitly allowed, compensation is not permitted. Always respect independent minima.
Final Answer:
if the candidate is not to be selected
Discussion & Comments