Eligibility Decision — Systems/IT Profile (self-contained policy + candidate) Policy (Systems/IT roles): • BE in CS/IT/Electronics (or equivalent) with ≥ 60%. • Selection written ≥ 50% and interview ≥ 50%. • Relevant Systems/IT experience ≥ 5 years. • All met → Select; if experience ≥ 10 years with all minima → Refer to GM - Systems; any clear shortfall → Not to be selected; missing critical data → Information inadequate. Candidate: Gemma D'Souza — Born 15 December 1972; Deputy Systems Manager 6 years; BE (Electronics) 75%; Written 60%; Interview 60%. Determine the decision code.

Introduction / Context:All independent minima are clearly satisfied, and tenure is above the basic threshold but below the senior-referral trigger. Therefore, the correct label is the direct selection outcome.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Minima: BE ≥ 60%; Written ≥ 50%; Interview ≥ 50%; Experience ≥ 5 years.
• Candidate: BE 75% (pass); Written 60% (pass); Interview 60% (pass); Experience 6 years (≥ 5 but < 10 → no GM referral).

Concept / Approach:Check each gate; with all met and tenure < 10 years, select directly.

Step-by-Step Solution:BE: 75% → Pass.Written: 60% → Pass.Interview: 60% → Pass.Experience: 6 years → Meets minimum; senior referral not triggered.Decision: To be selected.

Verification / Alternative check:No missing or borderline values exist; equality rules are not even required here as all exceed minima comfortably.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Not to be selected” contradicts the passes. “Refer to DGM/GM” requires either a stated intermediate route (not given) or ≥ 10 years experience plus all minima (not the case).

Common Pitfalls:Over-applying referral logic when senior tenure condition is not met.

Final Answer:if the candidate is to be selected