Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if the candidate is not to be selected
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This profile features two potential issues: a low graduation percentage and insufficient tenure. Either one would be disqualifying under independent minima. The exercise reinforces the “no compensation” principle unless a waiver is written.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Check each threshold independently; any failure results in “not to be selected.” A strong PG result cannot offset deficits in graduation percentage or experience unless explicitly allowed.
Step-by-Step Solution:
PG HR: 68% → Pass.Graduation: 50% → Fail (cutoff 55%).Selection: 50% → Pass (exact cutoff).Experience: 4 years → Fail (cutoff 5 years).Two independent failures → Decision = Not to be selected.
Verification / Alternative check:
Even if tenure were rounded, the graduation shortfall stands. Policy requires “≥” not “near,” and the candidate does not meet the minimums.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“To be selected” contradicts two shortfalls. “Information inadequate” is false; all fields are specified. “Refer to Director-Personnel” is for senior approval, not deficit waivers.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing rank/title (Deputy Manager) with eligibility minima; titles do not override baseline thresholds unless a separate rule exists.
Final Answer:
if the candidate is not to be selected
Discussion & Comments