Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if the case is to be referred to the Director-Personnel
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Beyond basic eligibility, some processes route senior profiles for higher-level approval when tenure crosses a threshold. This item checks that you recognize escalation triggers rather than issuing a direct selection.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Validate minima; if satisfied, check for senior referral conditions. Do not confuse “eligible” with “directly select” when the process prescribes an approval route.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Graduation: 60% → Pass.PG HR: 70% → Pass.Selection: 60% → Pass.Experience: 11 years ≥ 10 years → Senior referral applies.Decision: Refer to Director-Personnel.
Verification / Alternative check:
All minima are met; thus “not to be selected” is wrong. Without the escalation rule, one would select; with it, referral is the correct label.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“To be selected” ignores the mandated senior-approval channel. “Information inadequate” is false (complete data). “Not to be selected” contradicts minima.
Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking process routing; thinking seniority merely “nice to note” rather than procedurally binding.
Final Answer:
if the case is to be referred to the Director-Personnel
Discussion & Comments