Eligibility Decision — HR/Personnel Profile (self-contained policy + candidate) Policy (HR/Personnel roles): • PG degree/diploma in HR/Personnel with ≥ 60%. • Graduation with ≥ 55%. • Selection process score ≥ 50%. • Relevant HR/Personnel experience ≥ 5 years. • All met → Select; if experience ≥ 10 years and all minima met → Refer to Director-Personnel for senior approval; shortfall → Not to be selected; missing critical data → Information inadequate. Candidate: Amit Saxena — Born 25 July 1973; Personnel Dept 11 years; PG Diploma HR 70%; Graduation 60%; Selection 60%. Determine the decision code.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: if the case is to be referred to the Director-Personnel

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Beyond basic eligibility, some processes route senior profiles for higher-level approval when tenure crosses a threshold. This item checks that you recognize escalation triggers rather than issuing a direct selection.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Minima: PG HR ≥ 60%; Graduation ≥ 55%; Selection ≥ 50%; Experience ≥ 5 years.
  • Senior referral: Experience ≥ 10 years with all minima satisfied → Refer to Director-Personnel.
  • Candidate: Graduation 60%, PG 70%, Selection 60%, Experience 11 years → all minima met and seniority threshold reached.


Concept / Approach:
Validate minima; if satisfied, check for senior referral conditions. Do not confuse “eligible” with “directly select” when the process prescribes an approval route.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Graduation: 60% → Pass.PG HR: 70% → Pass.Selection: 60% → Pass.Experience: 11 years ≥ 10 years → Senior referral applies.Decision: Refer to Director-Personnel.


Verification / Alternative check:
All minima are met; thus “not to be selected” is wrong. Without the escalation rule, one would select; with it, referral is the correct label.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“To be selected” ignores the mandated senior-approval channel. “Information inadequate” is false (complete data). “Not to be selected” contradicts minima.


Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking process routing; thinking seniority merely “nice to note” rather than procedurally binding.


Final Answer:
if the case is to be referred to the Director-Personnel

More Questions from Eligibility Test

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion