Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if the candidate is to be selected
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Eligibility puzzles require converting text into rules and applying them consistently. Here, a marketing candidate must meet minimum educational percentages, a selection test cutoff, and a minimum tenure in a relevant domain.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Evaluate each threshold. Any single failure implies “not to be selected.” If all pass, choose “to be selected.” “Data inadequate” is reserved for missing/unclear data only.
Step-by-Step Solution:
PG (Marketing): 60% → meets ≥ 60% (edge equality passes).Graduation: 60% → ≥ 55% (passes comfortably).Selection process: 80% → ≥ 50% (passes).Experience: 6 years in Marketing → ≥ 3 years (passes).All conditions satisfied → Select.
Verification / Alternative check:
Consider whether any hidden constraint (e.g., maximum age) could apply. None is specified within this self-contained policy; therefore, the four explicit checks control the outcome.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Not to be selected” would require a failing criterion — none exists. “Data inadequate” is inapplicable because all key fields are given. “Refer to Vice President marketing” is not triggered in the policy.
Common Pitfalls:
Misinterpreting “exactly 60%” as failing a “> 60%” requirement; the policy clearly uses ≥. Also, overlooking that the experience must be in Marketing specifically (it is).
Final Answer:
if the candidate is to be selected
Discussion & Comments