Statement — Many business offices are in buildings with two to eight floors.\nRule — If a building has more than three floors, then that building has a lift (elevator).\nQuestion — Which conclusion is necessarily true?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Any building that has a fifth floor necessarily has a lift.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
We must apply a conditional rule: floors > 3 → has lift. The task is to select the logically compelled consequence, not speculative statements about coverage of floors or buildings with ≤ 3 floors.



Given Data / Assumptions:


  • Domain: office buildings with 2–8 floors.
  • Conditional: If a building’s floor-count > 3, then the building has a lift.
  • No promises are made for 2- or 3-floor buildings.


Concept / Approach:
For any building to “have a fifth floor,” its floor-count is at least five, hence > 3. Therefore, by the rule, it must have a lift. Claims about “only above third” or “all floors reachable” exceed the given information.



Step-by-Step Solution:


Option A: Overreach; the rule states existence of a lift, not its reach.Option B: Adds a restriction (“only”) not present in the rule.Option C: Direct application of the conditional; compelled.Option D: Talks about 2 floors (≤ 3), which the rule leaves open.Option E: Incorrect since C follows.


Verification / Alternative check:
Any 5-, 6-, 7-, or 8-floor building must satisfy the antecedent and therefore has a lift.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:


A and B invent details; D asserts a negative beyond scope.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “has a lift” with operational details like which floors are served.



Final Answer:
Any building that has a fifth floor necessarily has a lift.

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion