Statement:\n“Supporting the Reserve Bank of India’s Clean Note Policy, we have introduced special polythene currency-note packets. These are secure, transparent, and unstapled. Please help us maintain this.” — A request to customers of Bank XYZ.\n\nAssumptions:\nI. Writing on currency notes is not in tune with RBI’s Clean Note Policy.\nII. Only people’s participation is sufficient to achieve the RBI policy’s desired outcome.\n\nWhich of the above assumptions is implicit in the statement?

Introduction / Context:
The bank promotes RBI’s Clean Note Policy by offering secure, transparent, unstapled polythene packets and asks customers to cooperate. We must identify what the bank must assume—not what may be loosely associated with the policy—for the request to make sense.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Action: Introduce polythene currency packets; request customer cooperation.
• Assumption I: Writing on notes violates the policy.
• Assumption II: Solely people’s participation suffices to achieve the policy’s goal.

Concept / Approach:
The statement concerns packet characteristics (secure, transparent, unstapled) and cooperation to “maintain this.” It says nothing about writing on notes; that is a different aspect of clean-note practices. Likewise, it does not claim that only public participation is sufficient; enforcement, bank handling, and printing standards also matter. Therefore, neither I nor II is required.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming every Clean Note instruction must reference all facets (e.g., no stapling, no scribbling). Here the focus is specifically on packaging/handling of notes.

Final Answer:
Neither Assumption I nor II is implicit.