Statement:\n“From the dawn of civilisation, India’s tradition of respect for cultural diversity and spiritual values has been the bedrock of its intercultural dialogue and interaction with civilisations, countries, and nations,” says the Ministry of HRD.\n\nAssumptions:\nI. Other countries do not respect cultural diversity and spiritual values.\nII. The idea of a “Dialogue Among Civilisations” has become more important in the contemporary global scenario.\n\nWhich of the above assumptions is implicit in the statement?

Introduction / Context:
The ministry highlights India’s long-standing respect for cultural diversity and spiritual values as the “bedrock” for intercultural dialogue. Typically, such positioning speaks to current relevance—signalling why this heritage matters now. We must test which background belief is necessary for the statement’s communicative purpose.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Claim: India’s tradition has underpinned intercultural dialogue since ancient times.
• Assumption I: Other countries lack respect for diversity and spiritual values.
• Assumption II: Dialogue among civilisations has gained salience in today’s global context.

Concept / Approach:
The statement does not require a negative claim about other countries (I). It is compatible with many nations valuing diversity. However, invoking “bedrock” and civilisational dialogue implies that such dialogue is significant now, making India’s tradition particularly pertinent (II).

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming a boast implies others’ inferiority. The statement is affirmative about India, not dismissive of others.

Final Answer:
Only Assumption II is implicit.