Statement:\n“Buy X Dairy milk—fresh, pure, and hygienic,” says an advertisement.\n\nAssumptions:\nI. Other brands of milk are also available in the market.\nII. X Dairy’s milk is the most expensive.\n\nWhich of the above assumptions is implicit in the statement?

Introduction / Context:
Brand advertisements typically differentiate products in a competitive landscape. We ask which belief is necessary for the ad’s recommendation to make sense: market plurality (I) or a claim about premium pricing (II).

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Message: Buy milk from X Dairy—quality cues given.
• Assumption I: Alternatives exist; consumers make brand choices.
• Assumption II: X Dairy is the most expensive brand.

Concept / Approach:
Persuasion presupposes choice. If there were no alternative brands, there would be little need to advertise brand attributes; hence I is assumed. Price extremity (II) is neither stated nor required; the ad can position quality at any price point. Therefore II is not necessary.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Equating quality positioning with premium pricing; many brands claim quality without being the most expensive.

Final Answer:
Only Assumption I is implicit.