In jaw crushers, how does choke crushing (operating with a full chamber) compare to free crushing in terms of capacity and power consumption?
-
AResults in increased capacity
-
BConsumes less power
-
CConsumes more power
-
DBoth (a) and (c)
-
ENeither (a) nor (c)
Answer
Correct Answer: Both (a) and (c)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Crusher performance depends on feed conditions. “Choke” operation keeps the crushing chamber full, altering inter-particle breakage and throughput relative to lightly loaded (free) conditions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Same machine and feed characteristics, but different chamber loading.
- Choke implies continuous, full-feed operation.
Concept / Approach:Choke crushing enhances inter-particle breakage and increases the product density and throughput (capacity). However, the higher load also raises power draw due to increased work on the material and frictional effects.
Step-by-Step Solution:Compare capacity under free vs choke: choke is higher.Compare power: choke draws more due to greater material load.Therefore, (a) and (c) are both true.
Verification / Alternative check:Plant data and vendor curves show improved tph in choke operation along with higher absorbed kW.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Less power: contrary to increased load.Single statements omit the coupling of both capacity and power changes.
Common Pitfalls:Running starved-feed due to fear of power spikes; this often reduces efficiency.
Final Answer:Both (a) and (c)