Statement–Argument — Should parents play with their children? Arguments: I) Yes; it builds healthy and much-needed companionship between children and parents. II) No; children then treat parents like equals and distance is lost. Choose the strong argument(s).

Introduction / Context:
Parental engagement is often linked to better bonding and development. Strong arguments should connect to these outcomes rather than conjectural fears about “lost distance.”

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Play fosters trust, communication, and socio-emotional learning.
• Authority and boundaries can coexist with warmth and play.
• Loss of respect is not a necessary consequence of play.

Concept / Approach:
Argument I directly cites companionship as a developmental and relational benefit—specific and relevant. Argument II predicts a negative effect (lost distance/respect) without necessity or mechanism; boundaries can be maintained through consistent parenting, so it is weak.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Many parenting frameworks encourage guided play while preserving roles, supporting I and undermining II’s inevitability claim.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Either” would treat II as strong; “Neither” ignores I’s strength.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming affection undermines authority rather than complementing it.

Final Answer:
if only Argument I is strong.