Micro-biosensors overview: Which statements about micro-scale biosensors are accurate in biomedical and analytical applications?

Biotechnology Biosensors and Biochips Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    They can be implanted for in-vivo measurements in humans/animals
  • B
    They can be integrated on a single chip to measure multiple substrates in tiny samples
  • C
    They can be mass-produced as disposable transducers
  • D
    All of these
  • E
    None of these

Answer

Correct Answer: All of these

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Micro-biosensors combine microfabrication with biochemical recognition to monitor metabolites, ions, or biomarkers in small volumes or in vivo. Their compact size and integrability enable point-of-care testing, implantable monitors, and high-throughput screening.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Implantable use requires biocompatibility and miniaturization.
  • Integration on-chip enables multiplexed assays.
  • Mass production reduces cost and enables disposability.

Concept / Approach:Advances in MEMS, microfluidics, and surface chemistry allow robust, selective sensors on silicon, polymers, or flexible substrates. Disposable formats minimize fouling risks and cross-contamination, while implants provide continuous monitoring (for example, glucose sensors).

Step-by-Step Solution:

Assess each statement against current micro-biosensor capabilities.Recognize that all three are documented in clinical/analytical literature.Conclude that the comprehensive option is correct.

Verification / Alternative check:Commercial continuous glucose monitors, lab-on-chip analyzers, and disposable strips exemplify implantation, integration, and mass production.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

“None of these” contradicts established technology.

Common Pitfalls:Assuming that implantability and disposability are mutually exclusive; different designs serve different use-cases.

Final Answer:All of these.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion