Statement–Argument — Should sex determination tests during pregnancy be completely banned? Arguments: I) Yes; such tests enable female foeticide and can fuel severe gender imbalance. II) No; people have a right to know about their unborn child. Choose the strong argument(s).

Introduction / Context:
Sex-selective practices can distort demographics and perpetuate discrimination. Policy often restricts prenatal sex disclosure to curb such harms. We evaluate which argument better serves public interest.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Sex determination can be misused for selective termination.
• Gender imbalance has long-term social costs (marriage squeeze, trafficking risks, entrenched bias).
• Information rights are not absolute; they are limited to prevent harm.

Concept / Approach:
Argument I is strong: it identifies a direct causal link between availability of sex information and discriminatory outcomes, justifying prohibition. Argument II asserts a generic “right to know” without addressing the concrete harm or proposing safeguards that prevent misuse.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Many jurisdictions restrict disclosure of fetal sex until late pregnancy or prohibit tests unless medically indicated; this supports I’s policy logic.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Either/Neither/Only II” misjudge the balance between harm prevention and bare information claims.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming all information rights are superior to harm-prevention concerns.

Final Answer:
if only Argument I is Strong.