Statement: Should there be a ban on product advertisements? Arguments: I. No. In a competitive era, informative advertising helps products reach consumers; better ads improve discovery. II. Yes. Advertising spends are huge and inflate product cost. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
-
Aif only Argument I is strong
-
Bif only Argument II is strong
-
Cif either I nor II is strong
-
Dif both I and II are strong
-
Eif neither I nor II is strong
Answer
Correct Answer: if only Argument I is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Advertising can mislead, but it also conveys information on availability, features, and prices. A total ban is extreme.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Competition and consumer welfare benefit from information flows.
- Regulation (truth-in-advertising) exists to curb deceptive claims.
Concept / Approach:Assess proportionality: regulate content/costs vs. ban all ads.
Step-by-Step Solution:I argues for consumer information and market function. This is policy-relevant and proportional; regulate, do not ban. Strong.II notes cost pass-through, but that favors limits or transparency, not prohibition. Weak for a total ban.
Verification / Alternative check:Most markets balance consumer protection with informative advertising.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Either/both misclassify; neither ignores the solid rationale in I.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming all ad spend is waste; ignoring disclosure/competition effects.
Final Answer:if only Argument I is strong