Argument Evaluation: “Nations do not compete with each other in the way corporations do.” Which of the following, if true, most weakens the statement?
-
ATrade deficit is a sign of national strength; profits are a sign of corporate strength
-
BIncrease in human development index improves national standing; increase in market share improves corporate standing
-
CClimate negotiations lead to global improvement; CSR initiatives lead to image improvement
-
DNations go to war to capture territory; corporations contend to capture market share
-
ENone of the above
Answer
Correct Answer: Nations go to war to capture territory; corporations contend to capture market share
Explanation
Introduction / Context:To weaken “nations do not compete like corporations,” we need a parallel between forms of competition for scarce resources or strategic position.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Corporations vie for market share and profits.
- Nations compete for territory, influence, trade routes, technology, and talent.
Concept / Approach:A strong weakener shows analogous competitive behaviors.
Step-by-Step Solution:Option D creates a clear analogy: territorial conquest vs. market capture—both are strategic competitions for scarce, valuable assets. This similarity undermines the claim of dissimilarity.Options A, B, and C contrast metrics and outcomes but do not establish similarity in competitive behavior.
Verification / Alternative check:Historical and economic evidence shows interstate competition over resources and influence, analogous to corporate competition over customers and markets.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:They draw distinctions rather than parallels; thus they do not weaken the original statement.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing differences in metrics with differences in the underlying competitive nature.
Final Answer:Nations go to war to capture territory; corporations contend to capture market share