Argument Evaluation: “Nations do not compete with each other in the way corporations do.” Which of the following, if true, most weakens the statement?

Introduction / Context:
To weaken “nations do not compete like corporations,” we need a parallel between forms of competition for scarce resources or strategic position.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Corporations vie for market share and profits.
• Nations compete for territory, influence, trade routes, technology, and talent.

Concept / Approach:
A strong weakener shows analogous competitive behaviors.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Option D creates a clear analogy: territorial conquest vs. market capture—both are strategic competitions for scarce, valuable assets. This similarity undermines the claim of dissimilarity.Options A, B, and C contrast metrics and outcomes but do not establish similarity in competitive behavior.

Verification / Alternative check:
Historical and economic evidence shows interstate competition over resources and influence, analogous to corporate competition over customers and markets.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They draw distinctions rather than parallels; thus they do not weaken the original statement.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing differences in metrics with differences in the underlying competitive nature.

Final Answer:
Nations go to war to capture territory; corporations contend to capture market share