Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Organ-trade policy engages ethics (coercion, exploitation), safety, and regulation. Strong arguments must address harm prevention and system integrity.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Assess if the argument is normative and mechanism-based.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I: “Other countries do it” is weak; policies are context-specific and does not address exploitation/safety. Weak.II: Warns of a surge in sales and related abuses—this is directly relevant to public protection. Strong.
Verification / Alternative check:
Ethical frameworks prioritize donation systems over commodification to reduce exploitation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Either/both misclassify; neither ignores the valid risk rationale in II.
Common Pitfalls:
Appeal to practice elsewhere without ethical analysis.
Final Answer:
if only argument II is strong
Discussion & Comments