Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If both (R1) and (R2) are reasons for the assertion (A).
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This item involves cultural preference shifts. We must see whether the stated reasons could plausibly contribute to the asserted change, recognizing that music taste is multi-factorial and subjective.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
While both reasons are value-laden, they capture plausible perceived attributes affecting youth choices: tempo/energy for (R1); linguistic/poetic complexity or formalism for (R2). Explanations in cultural domains need not be absolute to be contributory.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Other drivers (globalization, streaming platforms, peer influence) also operate, but (R1) and (R2) remain credible contributors.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) or (b) over-privilege a single factor; (d) denies reasonable influences; (e) is unnecessary hedging when both are plausible.
Common Pitfalls:
Treating cultural claims as universal; ignoring plurality of drivers.
Final Answer:
Option C: Both (R1) and (R2) are reasons.
Discussion & Comments