Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If only reason 1 (R1) and not reason 2 (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The assertion paraphrases a famous metaphor likening religion’s social/psychological role to opium’s palliative effects. We must decide which reason best captures that metaphorical linkage.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The metaphor emphasizes comfort/soothing/escape from hardship—not a moral evaluation. Thus a statement about opium’s palliative feature aligns; a blanket moral valuation does not address the analogy’s mechanism.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Readings of the phrase stress relief/escapism elements rather than a moral appraisal.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(b) elevates an irrelevant moral claim; (c) includes (R2) without justification; (d) denies the aptness of (R1); (e) hedges needlessly.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing descriptive metaphors with moral judgments; reading “opium” as praise.
Final Answer:
Option A: Only (R1) explains the assertion.
Discussion & Comments