Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If neither (R1) nor (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Floating is governed by relative density and buoyancy, not by post-hoc descriptions of how much is submerged. This question probes correct physical reasoning.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Buoyancy states that an object floats when its average density is less than the fluid’s density. Sea ice/icebergs (density ~0.92 g/cm^3) are less dense than seawater (~1.025 g/cm^3), hence they float. R1 is an effect/ratio of buoyant equilibrium, not the reason. R2 contradicts the density condition for floating.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Evaluate R1: It reports the floating geometry but does not explain why floating occurs.2) Evaluate R2: If an iceberg were heavier (denser) than water, it would sink; therefore R2 is false as a reason.3) Neither R1 nor R2 serves as the causal explanation.Verification / Alternative check:The correct reason would be “Ice is less dense than seawater; buoyant force balances weight at partial submergence.”
Why Other Options Are Wrong:A/B/C wrongly confer causal status to a description or a false statement.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing observed proportions (how much shows above water) with the underlying cause (density difference).
Final Answer:If neither (R1) nor (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
Discussion & Comments