Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If only reason 1 (R1) and not reason 2 (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
We evaluate which of the two proposed reasons plausibly supports the assertion about employment patterns in global software firms.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Valid explanations should be evidence-based and non-essentialist. Language proficiency, large STEM graduate base, cost arbitrage, and ecosystem maturity are widely cited contributors. Genetic essentialism is unscientific and not an acceptable explanatory basis.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Additional valid factors (training, policy, industry clusters) reinforce that (R1) can be a reason even without (R2).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(b) assigns weight to (R2); (c) validates both; (d) discards a sound factor (R1); (e) hedges without justification.
Common Pitfalls:
Accepting essentialist/genetic explanations for complex socioeconomic outcomes.
Final Answer:
Option A: Only (R1) is the reason.
Discussion & Comments