Assertion–Reason (Two Reasons):\nAssertion (A): R. K. Laxman was honoured with the Padma Vibhushan award.\nReason (R1): R. K. Laxman was a renowned Indian author who wrote in English.\nReason (R2): R. K. Laxman created the iconic “Common Man” character.

Difficulty: Easy

If only reason 1 (R1) and not reason 2 (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
If only reason 2 (R2) and not reason 1 (R1) is the reason for the assertion (A).
If both (R1) and (R2) are reasons for the assertion (A).
If neither (R1) nor (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
If (R1) is partly correct and (R2) is partly correct.

Correct Answer: If only reason 2 (R2) and not reason 1 (R1) is the reason for the assertion (A).

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:
This Assertion–Reason item tests whether each proposed reason genuinely supports the recognition of R. K. Laxman with the Padma Vibhushan. The award is India’s second-highest civilian honour, typically conferred for exceptional and distinguished service. We must judge the truth of (A), then evaluate (R1) and (R2) as possible explanations.

Given Data / Assumptions:

(A) states Laxman received the Padma Vibhushan.
(R1) identifies him primarily as an English-language author.
(R2) credits him with creating the “Common Man,” the widely recognized cartoon figure.

Concept / Approach:
To validate an explanation, confirm factual correctness and causal relevance. The reason should accurately reflect the person’s distinguished contribution for which such an honour is typically bestowed.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Truth of (A): R. K. Laxman is celebrated for decades of influential cartooning; the assertion is acceptable as a statement of national recognition.2) Evaluate (R1): Though Laxman did write columns and books, his identity and renown rest chiefly on cartooning—not on being an “English author.” Thus (R1) mischaracterizes his primary contribution and is not a good reason.3) Evaluate (R2): The “Common Man” is Laxman’s signature creation and an enduring cultural symbol. This precisely captures the nature of his distinguished contribution and thus provides a sound explanatory link to (A).

Verification / Alternative check:
His career-defining work was political and social satire via cartoons, consistently associated with the “Common Man.” The honour aligns with that cultural impact.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) validates the wrong reason; (c) accepts both, but (R1) is inaccurate; (d) rejects both, ignoring (R2)’s clear relevance; (e) hedges without need, since (R2) alone suffices.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing primary contribution (cartooning) with ancillary writing; assuming any published author label is an adequate explanation for the award.

Final Answer:
Option B: Only (R2) is the reason.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Assertion–Reason (Two Reasons):\nAssertion (A): R. K. Laxman was honoured with the Padma Vibhushan award.\nReason (R1): R. K. Laxman was a renowned Indian author who wrote in English.\nReason (R2): R. K. Laxman created the iconic “Common Man” character.

More Questions from Assertion and Reason

Discussion & Comments