Assertion–Reason (Two Reasons): Assertion (A): R. K. Laxman was honoured with the Padma Vibhushan award. Reason (R1): R. K. Laxman was a renowned Indian author who wrote in English. Reason (R2): R. K. Laxman created the iconic “Common Man” character.
-
AIf only reason 1 (R1) and not reason 2 (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
-
BIf only reason 2 (R2) and not reason 1 (R1) is the reason for the assertion (A).
-
CIf both (R1) and (R2) are reasons for the assertion (A).
-
DIf neither (R1) nor (R2) is the reason for the assertion (A).
-
EIf (R1) is partly correct and (R2) is partly correct.
Answer
Correct Answer: If only reason 2 (R2) and not reason 1 (R1) is the reason for the assertion (A).
Explanation
Introduction / Context:This Assertion–Reason item tests whether each proposed reason genuinely supports the recognition of R. K. Laxman with the Padma Vibhushan. The award is India’s second-highest civilian honour, typically conferred for exceptional and distinguished service. We must judge the truth of (A), then evaluate (R1) and (R2) as possible explanations.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- (A) states Laxman received the Padma Vibhushan.
- (R1) identifies him primarily as an English-language author.
- (R2) credits him with creating the “Common Man,” the widely recognized cartoon figure.
Concept / Approach:To validate an explanation, confirm factual correctness and causal relevance. The reason should accurately reflect the person’s distinguished contribution for which such an honour is typically bestowed.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Truth of (A): R. K. Laxman is celebrated for decades of influential cartooning; the assertion is acceptable as a statement of national recognition.2) Evaluate (R1): Though Laxman did write columns and books, his identity and renown rest chiefly on cartooning—not on being an “English author.” Thus (R1) mischaracterizes his primary contribution and is not a good reason.3) Evaluate (R2): The “Common Man” is Laxman’s signature creation and an enduring cultural symbol. This precisely captures the nature of his distinguished contribution and thus provides a sound explanatory link to (A).Verification / Alternative check:His career-defining work was political and social satire via cartoons, consistently associated with the “Common Man.” The honour aligns with that cultural impact.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:(a) validates the wrong reason; (c) accepts both, but (R1) is inaccurate; (d) rejects both, ignoring (R2)’s clear relevance; (e) hedges without need, since (R2) alone suffices.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing primary contribution (cartooning) with ancillary writing; assuming any published author label is an adequate explanation for the award.
Final Answer:Option B: Only (R2) is the reason.