Analogy — Choose the pair that mirrors the adjective→person relationship: Impecunious : Mendicant :: ?

Introduction / Context:
This is a semantic analogy. “Impecunious” is an adjective meaning lacking money or very poor, and “mendicant” is a noun meaning beggar (a person who begs). The relationship is adjective describing a quality → noun for a person characterized by or engaging in conduct associated with that quality. We must choose the pair that best preserves this adjective→person mapping.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Impecunious (adjective) → very poor.
• Mendicant (noun) → one who begs, commonly due to poverty.
• We seek an adjective whose typical collocation identifies a person by role or habitual act.

Concept / Approach:
Check which option is a well-formed and widely accepted adjective–noun collocation that names a type of person by trait-driven behavior, paralleling impecunious→mendicant.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Language usage strongly favors the fixed phrase “compulsive liar” to denote a person habitually lying due to compulsion. This mirrors impecunious→mendicant, where the adjective describes a state that is tightly associated with the person-noun.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Prodigal : Philanthropist — mismatched domains (wastefulness vs charitable giving).
• Petulant : Complainer — not a standard role noun uniquely determined by the adjective.
• Quizzical : Critic — profession vs mood; not a defining trait relation.
• None of these — incorrect because “Compulsive : Liar” fits precisely.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating mere co-occurrence with a defining, name-giving relation. The target noun should label a person type determined by the adjective-driven trait.

Final Answer:
Compulsive : Liar