HDL project scoping: which item is not strictly a scope-definition step? When defining the scope of a hardware description language (HDL) project, identify which item below does not belong to initial scope definition and is more about detailed implementation planning.

Introduction / Context:
Project scope establishes boundaries and requirements before implementation. In HDL work, scope definition clarifies interfaces, performance, and data widths, enabling modular design and estimation. Detailed “how” decisions typically follow in the design phase, not in scope-setting.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Scope focuses on “what” and “why” more than “how.”
• Key scope elements: I/O polarity, performance targets, word sizes.
• Implementation details (specific techniques) are subsequent steps.

Concept / Approach:
Distinguish requirements from solutions. Scope should define signals, throughput/latency limits, and resource ranges. Devising the exact internal mechanisms for each block is a design activity after scope agreement.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Standard development lifecycles: requirements → architecture → design → implementation → verification.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• A/C/D are direct, scoping-level requirements.

Common Pitfalls:
Locking into a specific solution too early can preclude better architectures discovered later.

Final Answer:
A clear vision of how to make each block work