Effect of magnetic field on superconductivity When a material is in the superconducting state and an external magnetic field is applied, what is the correct outcome regarding its superconducting property?
-
AThe superconducting property is not affected
-
BResistivity may increase from zero to a small value, but superconductivity persists
-
CThe superconducting property may be destroyed (above a critical field)
-
DThe material becomes an electrical insulator
-
EThe material becomes a perfect paramagnet
Answer
Correct Answer: The superconducting property may be destroyed (above a critical field)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Superconductors exhibit zero DC resistance and the Meissner effect (expulsion of magnetic flux). However, these properties hold only below certain critical parameters: temperature, magnetic field, and current density. Recognizing the critical field concept is essential for magnet design, power devices, and cryogenic systems.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Material is superconducting initially (T below critical temperature Tc).
- A magnetic field is applied externally.
- Critical field Hc (or Hc1, Hc2 for type-II) limits exist.
Concept / Approach:
For type-I superconductors, superconductivity is destroyed when the applied field exceeds the thermodynamic critical field Hc. For type-II superconductors, superconductivity persists in a mixed state between Hc1 and Hc2, but is destroyed above Hc2. Hence, in general, an applied field can terminate superconductivity if it is strong enough, making option (c) correct.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Start in superconducting state at T < Tc.Increase external field H.When H >= critical field (Hc for type-I or Hc2 for type-II), superconductivity vanishes.Verification / Alternative check:
Experimental magnetization curves show flux expulsion and sudden loss of superconductivity beyond critical fields; practical superconducting magnets operate well below Hc2 to avoid quenching.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) ignores critical fields; (b) introduces a “small resistivity” concept inconsistent with the definition; (d) insulator behavior is unrelated; (e) superconductors are not paramagnets in the Meissner state.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing type-II mixed states with finite resistance (they still carry DC without loss below Jc), and ignoring the role of pinning and quench behavior.
Final Answer:
The superconducting property may be destroyed (above a critical field)