Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Second hypothesis of Weiss
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Ferromagnetism arises from exchange interactions causing parallel spin alignment below the Curie temperature. Historically, Pierre Weiss proposed hypotheses to explain ferromagnetic behavior, including the presence of domains that are spontaneously magnetized even without an external field. Recognizing which hypothesis addresses domains is essential for foundational magnetism knowledge.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Weiss advanced two related ideas. The first hypothesis (molecular or internal field) explains cooperative alignment. The second hypothesis asserts that ferromagnets are divided into many small regions (domains), each spontaneously magnetized to saturation. Macroscopic magnetization is the vector sum over domains; in zero external field, domains are randomly oriented, yielding near-zero net magnetization despite spontaneous magnetization within each domain.
Step-by-Step Reasoning:
Verification / Alternative check:
Standard magnetism texts describe: (1) molecular field hypothesis; (2) domain hypothesis (spontaneous magnetization in domains). Curie–Weiss law instead relates susceptibility and temperature above the Curie point; Boltzmann statistics is a general thermodynamic framework, not a specific ferromagnetic domain postulate.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing Weiss’s two hypotheses or mixing up Curie–Weiss law (paramagnetic regime) with domain theory (ferromagnetic regime below Tc).
Final Answer:
Second hypothesis of Weiss
Discussion & Comments