Statement and Argument Questions

• Statement: Should mercy death (euthanasia) be legalised for terminally ill patients who desire it? Arguments: I. No. Ending one’s life violates basic tenets of humanity. II. Yes. Patients undergoing terrible, untreatable suffering with no chance of recovery should be allowed mercy death. III. No. Even mercy death is killing, and killing can never be legalised. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
• Statement: Should women be given equal opportunities for employment in every field? Arguments: I. Yes. They are equally capable. II. No. They must shoulder household responsibilities. III. Yes. They too should participate in the outside world. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
• Argument Evaluation (Strengthen): Consider the claim: “Employees who use the gymnasium facilities are fit.” Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the claim?
• Argument Evaluation (Weaken): Consider the claim: “All employees who use the gymnasium facilities are fit.” Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the claim?
• Argument Evaluation: “Nations do not compete with each other in the way corporations do.” Which of the following, if true, most weakens the statement?
• Argument Evaluation: “Major diseases afflict the elderly disproportionately, and they are generally very expensive to treat.” Which option, if true, most strengthens this statement?
• Statement: Should sale of vital human organs be made legal in India? Arguments: I. No. It goes against our culture. II. No. It will lead to unhealthy practices. III. Yes. It will end illegal trading of organs. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
• Statement: Should conscription (compulsory defence service) be introduced in India? Arguments: I. Yes. It is the only way to tackle serious manpower shortages in defence services. II. No. Improve compensation to attract volunteers comparable to other sectors. III. Yes. Many other countries have made this compulsory. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
• Statement: Should all deemed universities be de-recognised and attached to a Central or State university? Arguments: I. Yes. Many do not meet the standards of a full-fledged university, compromising education quality. II. No. Their autonomy allows innovative, industry-relevant courses free from strict controls. III. Yes. Many operate as money-making enterprises where education takes a back seat. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
• Statement: Should all management institutes in the country be brought under government control? Arguments: I. No. The government lacks adequate resources to run all such institutes effectively. II. No. Each institute should have freedom to function autonomously. III. Yes. This will standardize education across all students. IV. Yes. Only then will the quality of education improve. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).
• Statement–Argument (Mandatory Rural Service for Medical Graduates): Statement: Should government service in rural areas for at least two years after completing graduation be made compulsory for students of medicine? Arguments: I) Yes, every qualified doctor has a social duty to serve rural populations and contribute to their upliftment. II) No, such a rule unfairly targets only medical graduates, who already contribute during internship; compulsion should not single out one profession. Select the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Journalist Access to Sensitive Information): Statement: Should the government restrict journalists’ access to sensitive information to avoid hype and potential harm? Arguments: I) Yes, sensational coverage can distort facts and escalate crises. II) No, robust access enables the media to expose malfunctions and support accountability. III) Yes, premature disclosure can harass or endanger people involved. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Education Loans with Service Bonds): Statement: Before sanctioning education loans for higher studies, should the Government require students to sign a bond to work in India for a period? Arguments: I) No, such bonds are unworkable and could obstruct the development of young talent. II) Yes, this is the only way to ensure the nation benefits from its talent rather than just the individual. III) No, the step is too harsh. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Fewer, Larger Banks vs Many Smaller Banks): Statement: Should India have a few large banks instead of numerous smaller ones? Arguments: I) Yes, larger banks are better able to absorb intermittent market shocks and protect depositors. II) No, mergers will render many employees redundant and cause job losses. III) Yes, consolidation will strengthen the sector and foster healthier competition. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Temporary Ban on New Car Registrations in Metros): Statement: Should big Indian cities impose a complete ban on registering new cars for a few months? Arguments: I) Yes, it will significantly reduce vehicles on already overcrowded roads. II) Yes, current car owners will be happier with fewer peak-hour jams. III) No, it is discriminatory against those planning to buy now. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Ban on Professionals Seeking Jobs Abroad): Statement: Should India impose a complete ban on Indian professionals taking jobs abroad after being educated in India? Arguments: I) Yes, it is the only way to sustain the current pace of technological development domestically. II) No, Indians abroad remit substantial foreign exchange, aiding reserves. III) No, experience gained overseas helps India’s economy when knowledge returns or networks form. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Ban Foodgrain Exports During Drought): Statement: Facing an unexpected drought, should the government ban export of all foodgrains for one year? Arguments: I) Yes, otherwise adequate food supply for citizens cannot be ensured. II) No, the government lacks jurisdiction to ban private exporters. III) Yes, the government should stop exports and procure available stocks for domestic use. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (University Admission with HSC Backlogs): Statement: Should students who failed in one or two HSC subjects be allowed provisional admission to degree courses, subject to passing supplementary exams? Arguments: I) Yes, this avoids a one-year break and helps educational continuity. II) Yes, it is a forward-looking policy that motivates higher studies. III) No, students should not continue without clearing all HSC subjects first. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Eligibility for Post-Graduate Enrollment Across Disciplines): Statement: Should any graduate be allowed to enroll in a post-graduate programme of their choice regardless of undergraduate discipline? Arguments: I) Yes, students know their capabilities; there should be no restrictions. II) No, relevant prerequisites are needed; eligibility criteria must be satisfied. III) No, there are not enough PG seats to accommodate all interested graduates. Choose the strongest evaluation.
• Statement–Argument (Literacy as Minimum Criterion to Vote): Statement: Should “literacy” be the minimum eligibility criterion to become a voter in India? Arguments: I) No, literacy alone does not guarantee political maturity. II) Yes, illiterate persons are less likely to make wise electoral choices. III) No, voting is a constitutional right of every adult citizen. Choose the strongest evaluation.